**Fri: Opening**Berry Bon Bon Frozen Yogurt Shop & Cafe**412 Washington Street**
**TODAY Thu: "America in Bloom" meeting**VFW**7:30**All Welcome**
***TODAY Thu: Art Saves Lives***High School***4-8pm***See below***
**TODAY Thu: Holliston Community Jazz Night**Upper Town Hall**7-11pm**
**Sun: Community Mulch Spreading Day**Goodwill Park Playground**9am-3pm**
***Sun: Newcomers 10K Road Race**Holliston High**9am***

Stipends for Elected Officials: A Closer Look

by William Dowd 1/29/12

As budget review season continues, lots of time will spent on some really big numbers. To their credit, the Finance Committee will also spend lots of time on some smaller numbers too. But sometimes, numbers that look small can be deceiving.


 For example, take stipends for elected officials. Some boards/committees take monetary stipends, some do not. Here are the elected officials and boards -- other than the Town Clerk which is a full-time position -- whose members are authorized to take a monetary stipend and the total amount for stipends in the current year's budget. This is not the amount each person receives, but the total for the Board. Some members of these Boards may be refusing the stipend:
Moderator                               $     25
Selectmen                               $   175
Board of Health                        $     90
Assessors                                $7,500
Water Commissioners               $   100


Here's the list of elected boards/committees NOT currently authorized to take a monetary stipend:
School Committee
Finance Committee
Housing Authority
Library Trustees
Park Commission
Planning Board

Why do some get a stipend and others don't? No one seems to have an answer. What is the purpose of the stipend? Again, no one seems to have an answer. The most common response is "It's being going on for a long time."

If you add all the stipends up, you're still talking about a pretty small number. But that's where looks are deceiving. Besides the disparate practice and the randomly varying amounts, there  are two aspects of these stipends that make them much more significant than they initially appear.

First, according to the infamous Mass General Laws Chapter 32B, just taking the stipend makes the elected official eligible for 60% Town paid health insurance. Just taking a random and nominal stipend payment opens the Town up to a potential $12,000 to $16,000 annual expense. This may have made sense back in the 1960's, but it makes no sense today. And the way the Town structures its budget, these health care costs don't show up in the elected board's budget. They show up in the Benefits and Insurance budget along with the costs for all Town employees. And this is NOT a theoretical problem. Even after Jay Marsden leaves the Town's health insurance on February 1, there is still one elected official enrolled in Town health insurance.

Second, the stipend payment policy and amounts are left to each board to decide for itself. No Town Meeting action is required. No By-Laws to amend. It's just bad public policy when an elected board  or committee is authorized to a.) decide whether or not to pay itself a stipend, and b.) set the amount of that stipend. The FinCom's response to all this was that they have no say over stipends. If a board decides to pay itself a stipend, as long as it fits within the "guideline" budget, it's ok with them.
I can't make any sense of the stipend practice, and most of the people I've talked to knew nothing of it, particularly that very small honoraria could trigger thousands of dollars in health insurance benefits.

I suggest that the stipend policy and amount be made a matter subject to Town Meeting approval. Any Board seeking to pay itself a stipend can put together a proposal that describes what it's for and how much and let Town Meeting decide. Town Meeting has to approve by 80% majority to pay old bills, the Selectmen have to get Town Meeting approval to auction off an old broken down pickup truck, and the pay rate for all non-union, non-contract positions are subject to vote of Town Meeting.  Shouldn't Town Meeting get a say on paying stipends to elected officials, especially with expensive health benefits that could go along with it?

I'm not sure how to fix this right now, but I'll be looking for a way to give Town Meeting a voice in the matter, particularly since the current arrangement is random, improperly authorized and a trigger for potentially thousands of dollars in health insurance costs. Even if Chapter 32B gets fixed to end the link between stipends and health insurance, I just think the voters in Town deserve to have a say in who gets a stipend, and how much it is.
 

 

Posted in Comments.

Comment on this article | E-mail this article

Comments (9)

Ken - You're right. I should not have said that as long as stipends fit in a budget the FinCom is ok with it. What I should have said, as you pointed out, is that the FinCom is powerless to change the stipend arrangements. All the more reason to put that authority in the hands of Town Meeting.
- Bill Dowd | 1/31/12 6:04 PM
Not sure about whether we are "authorized" to take stipends, but we certainly don't. So please add the conservation commission to that list.
- Ann Marie | 1/30/12 9:13 PM
Bill, thanks for the article. Whether you agree with the stipends or not, fiscal transparency for every committee and town expense is something to strive for, and it is good to see that this is being brought up.
- Ted Dooley | 1/30/12 7:03 PM
Bill, You are drawing inaccurate conclusions. The reserve fund transfer was for FY12 and had nothing to do with the FY13 budget request. The reason no discussion of the stipend took place last week was because we are all aware of the stipend situation and there was no need to ask about it again. Remember, what you saw last week was their budget presentation. There was no Fincom approval of anything pertaining to the request; you are making the assumption that because nothing was said about the stipend that we approve of it. That was what you wrote in your article and that was all I was trying to correct. We deliberate and vote on the budget requests in April after all budget presentations have been made and we (hopefully) have a better picture of the finances. If you have any further questions about this I'd be happy to discuss them with you next time I see you.
- Ken Szajda | 1/30/12 5:56 PM
Do away with the Stripends!!! I myself would not spend the time some of them do without compensation at this juncture in my life nor does the position passionately interest me. However, there used to be a time where people devoted their expertise to their Federal, State and Local governments for very minimal pay and even no pay.They did it for the betterment of their community. Now we have people making a living off of it and taking advantage of the system for personal gain. Small abuses over time quickly add up and don't sit well with the people paying the bills, especially in these challenging economic times.
- Sean | 1/30/12 2:44 PM
Tom - We actually agree more than you think. Even though I think we are generally well served by the many committees not taking stipends, I am not sure either that paying very small amounts or nothing gets us the best government. But looking at other levels of government where those who are elected are compensated is not encouraging. I welcome the discussion - which should culminate with Town Meeting action - and I am open to being convinced that we should be paying more folks more money. But I will also continue to point out the inappropriate link between these stipends and eligibility for thousands of dollars in health insurance benefits.
- Bill Dowd | 1/30/12 11:22 AM
Ken - The fact that all boards/committees can get a stipend but don't is an example of the wacky way this works, which is my point. As for the FinCom's approach, I'm working really hard to balance my criticism with respect for the FinCom's work, but just last Tuesday, you met with the Board of Assessors - the recipients of the largest stipend -and not only did the subject get no response from the FinCom, but the FinCom immediately approved a $5,000 Reserve Fund Transfer request from the Assessors. You're right that the FinCom has limited authority over how budgets get spent, but having to approve Reserve Fund Transfer requests is leverage that is going unapplied.
- Bill Dowd | 1/30/12 11:15 AM
I have to say I agree with Bill on one level, but I suspect we differ on another. The town should indeed have a more coherent and transparent and accountable approach towards compensating the people who serve as selectmen and on town boards and committees. But frankly, I think if we examine the level of compensation (without a predisposition towards resenting anyone who goes into town service) we should probably be compensating people a lot more. We make a decision about the kind of people who can serve and the kind who simply can't when we set that level of compensation. And I think it is worth questioning the assumption that we are best served by folks who don't require immediate compensation for the time they must put in to do the work competently. That's my 2ยข worth anyway.
- Tom Driscoll | 1/30/12 8:15 AM
Bill, Just to be clear on a couple of points...most if not all of the boards/committees you listed as not being able to take a stipend actually could do so if they wished. In most cases the boards have elected not to (and have therefore eliminated them from their budget requests). That is the case with the Fincom, for example. In the distant past Fincom members received a stipend. However, for many years the members have decided not to pay themselves one (this has been true every year that I have been on the Fincom). More importantly, it is inaccurate to say that paying stipends is "ok with the Fincom." We have brought up the issue of stipends with several boards over the years; each time we have suggested that boards consider eliminating stipends they have basically ignored our advice. As you correctly note we have no say over whether or not a board decides to pay themselves a stipend. We only recommend appropriation of an overall "personal services" budget; even if we eliminated the line item for stipends a board could still pay themselves a stipend.
- Ken Szajda | 1/30/12 7:56 AM
Casinos
Steve Napolitano
The constant Gardener
Gulf 2 Fund